NOW WHO PAYS??

 

THE TRADE DEAL COLLAPSED—NOW WHO PAYS?

Tariffs are announced by governments. The bill eventually reaches businesses, workers and consumers.

The latest attempt to settle the Canada–U.S. tariff dispute has collapsed, and the familiar language of economic warfare has returned.

The United States has imposed an additional 50 per cent tariff on approximately US$20 billion worth of selected Canadian exports. Prime Minister Mark Carney says Canada will respond “dollar for dollar,” with new tariffs on American goods beginning September 8.

It sounds like two governments standing firmly in defence of their citizens.

The citizens on both sides should keep a hand on their wallets.

THE ENTIRE TRADING RELATIONSHIP HAS NOT COLLAPSED

The failure of these negotiations does not mean the entire Canada–U.S. trading relationship has ended.

CUSMA remains in force, and most Canadian goods continue to enter the United States under its preferential rules.

The new American tariffs reportedly affect approximately five per cent of Canadian exports to the United States. That is not an economic blockade, but neither is it insignificant to the wineries, furniture manufacturers, dairy producers and sporting-goods companies caught in the targeted categories.

For an affected Canadian company, a 50 per cent tariff can make its product almost impossible to sell competitively in the American market. Orders may disappear, production may be reduced and workers may be laid off.

The damage will be concentrated even if the national percentage appears relatively small.

WHO PAYS A CANADIAN TARIFF?

Ottawa’s promised retaliation raises a question rarely explained in political announcements: who actually pays a Canadian tariff?

If an American widget enters Canada carrying a 50 per cent tariff, the Canadian importer writes the cheque to Ottawa. The importer then attempts to recover that cost from the Canadian business or consumer buying the widget.

The American manufacturer is hurt only if Canadians reduce their purchases, switch suppliers or force the manufacturer to lower its price.

If Canada has a competitive replacement for the American widget, the tariff could redirect sales toward Canadian production. Canadian factories could expand, Canadian workers could be hired and more of the economic value could remain here.

That is the best-case scenario.

But if no affordable Canadian alternative exists, the retaliatory tariff becomes a tax on Canadians. It can raise consumer prices, increase costs for Canadian manufacturers and leave Ottawa collecting additional revenue while declaring that it is punishing Washington.

“Dollar for dollar” sounds decisive. It does not guarantee that both countries suffer equal harm.

CANADA CANNOT MATCH AMERICAN ECONOMIC WEIGHT

Canada depends much more heavily on access to the American market than the United States depends upon Canada.

We can target politically influential American industries and states, but we cannot win an unrestricted contest of economic size.

The government’s September 8 tariff list must therefore be examined product by product:

• Is a Canadian substitute available?
• Can another reliable supplier replace the American product?
• Will the tariff protect Canadian employment?
• Will it increase costs for a Canadian manufacturer?
• Is it a finished consumer product or an indispensable component?

Without those answers, retaliation risks becoming Ottawa firing at Washington through the Canadian consumer.

WHAT WAS CANADA ASKED TO SURRENDER?

There are also larger questions that cannot yet be answered.

Carney says the United States introduced late demands that were unfair, uneconomic and injurious to Canadian sovereignty. American officials say Canada walked away from favourable terms.

Neither government has released the complete proposed agreement.

Until Canadians can see what Washington demanded, what Ottawa offered and precisely why the negotiations failed, the public is being asked to choose between competing political accounts.

The dispute may ultimately be about much more than wine, dairy, hockey sticks and trucks.

The United States is seeking tighter North American supply chains, stronger rules of origin and less Chinese penetration of the continental economy. It also has concerns about border security, Arctic defence, critical minerals and Canada’s ability—or willingness—to help defend the northern half of the continent.

Canada, meanwhile, must decide how much freedom over its trade, culture, resources and foreign relationships it is prepared to surrender in exchange for more predictable access to the American market.

Those are matters of national sovereignty, not merely tariff percentages.

MORE HEAT THAN LIGHT

For now, Canadians should resist both panic and political theatre.

The entire trading relationship has not collapsed. But confidence that Canada can rely upon stable American market access has suffered another serious blow.

That uncertainty may eventually do more damage than the immediate tariff list. Businesses do not invest billions in Canadian factories when they cannot predict whether those factories will remain competitive in the United States.

Carney may have been right to reject the proposed agreement. Trump may be applying pressure before eventually returning to the negotiating table. Both governments may be presenting only those parts of the story favourable to themselves.

We do not yet know.

What we do know is that tariffs are not paid by presidents or prime ministers. They are paid through higher prices, lost orders, reduced profits, cancelled investment and disappearing jobs.

Before Canada marches proudly into a dollar-for-dollar tariff war, Ottawa should tell Canadians precisely what was rejected—and demonstrate that its return fire will land in the United States rather than in Canadian wallets.

Until then, there is more heat than light—and the people paying the bill have not been shown the complete invoice.

---

Sources: Reuters: Canada announces retaliatory tariffs | White House tariff fact sheet | Government of Canada counter-tariff information

```