🎙️ Podcast Player
▶️ Click Play to listen
The “Groceries Benefit” Fog Machine: Cash Later, Prices Now
When a prime minister explains high grocery prices by pointing to the pandemic, global supply chains, tariffs, and climate change, you can hear the subtext: “Don’t look to Ottawa for the cause… or the fix.” Then comes the “solution”: a renamed GST credit boost, branded as the Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit.
That’s the shell game.
Here’s the part Canadians deserve to see clearly:
1) This isn’t “help paying GST on groceries”
Most basic groceries aren’t even charged GST/HST in Canada. They’re “zero-rated”—taxed at 0%. So when the government sells a GST-credit bump as a “groceries” measure, it’s mostly branding.
What they’re actually doing is sending cash to low- and modest-income households (through the existing GST/HST credit system) and calling it grocery help. Cash can help, yes. But it’s not a “GST rebate on groceries” in the way people naturally hear it.
2) The money doesn’t show up at the checkout
You pay today’s prices today.
The promised help comes later as a deposit/cheque—meaning your grocery bill doesn’t drop, and your cart doesn’t get cheaper. You just (maybe) get a payment down the road—after inflation has already had its bite.
3) The “big boost” becomes small, fast
At maximum current GST credit levels, a couple gets about $698/year right now.
The new plan adds:
a one-time top-up equal to 50% of the credit (about $349 for a max-eligible couple), and
a 25% increase to the ongoing credit for five years (about +$175/year for a max-eligible couple).
Do the weekly reality check:
After that one-time top-up is gone, the ongoing “grocery help” for a max-eligible couple is roughly $3.36 per week.
That’s not nothing to someone living tight. But it’s also not a price fix, and it isn’t the kind of structural relief people imagine when they hear “government is helping with grocery costs.”
4) Inflation quietly shaves it down before it even arrives
This is the part nobody emphasizes: even if you qualify, the first meaningful payment timing matters.
Food inflation has been running hot. If grocery prices rise faster than overall inflation—as they have—then the buying power of any delayed payment is eroded before it lands. A payment that arrives months from now buys less food than the same number of dollars would buy today.
So yes—Ottawa can announce “hundreds of dollars” with a smile in a grocery store. But the grocery store is exactly where those dollars shrink.
5) “12.6 million individuals and families” is a political headline, not a clear household count
They say this will help 12.6 million “individuals and families.” That sounds like the government has calculated the country is broadly struggling—and it’s using a very wide net.
But that statistic is not “12.6 million households,” and it’s not “12.6 million working people.” It’s essentially “benefit units” who would receive something—singles counted individually, couples counted as a single recipient unit, and various other household arrangements mixed in.
It’s a big number because it’s meant to be a big headline.
6) Is it a “rebate” if we’re running deficits?
Here’s the blunt truth: the GST credit is not a magical pile of money that comes from your GST and returns to you.
It’s a spending program delivered through the tax system.
If the federal books are in deficit—and they are—then unless Ottawa cuts other spending or raises other taxes to offset this program, we’re effectively borrowing to fund the benefit. In plain language: debt-financed relief.
Which leads to the uncomfortable question: are we “helping with affordability,” or are we adding to the long-term cost structure that helps drive affordability problems?
7) The missing part: domestic policy choices
Carney’s explanation leans hard on global forces—fine. Global factors matter. But that framing also conveniently downplays domestic choices that do affect affordability:
Competition and market structure in groceries and food processing
Taxes and compliance costs embedded in transportation, packaging, energy, and retail
Regulatory friction that blocks new entrants, slows expansions, and drives costs upward
Productivity policy—making it easier to build, ship, process, and sell things efficiently
And yes: if the country wants a stronger economy, policies that unlock export wealth—energy included—can increase national income and fiscal capacity. It won’t magically “make groceries cheap,” but it’s part of the real conversation that’s missing when every cause is external and every solution is a cash payout.
Bottom line
If you qualify for the benefit, take it. People under real pressure should get relief.
But Canadians shouldn’t be talked into thinking this is a checkout fix, or a “GST-on-groceries refund.” It’s a rebranded cash transfer, paid later, shrinking with inflation, and—unless offset—funded in a deficit framework.
That’s not nothing.
It’s just not what it’s being sold as.
Comments
Post a Comment
Pending moderation, your comment will be published. Thank You