Canada’s Gold: How We Sold the Family Silver (and Gold)
CANADIAN SENTINEL– Op‑Ed
Why we sold
This wasn’t a midnight fire sale. It was a policy
choice stretching back to the 1980s. Finance officials said gold didn’t fit a
floating currency and a liquidity‑first reserve mandate. Better, they argued,
to hold highly rated bonds and cash‑like instruments that pay interest and can
be deployed quickly in a crisis.
What that
choice cost (and saved)
Up to about 2003—the year Canada sold its last
bullion—Ottawa’s own accounting said the 'sell‑gold and hold interest‑bearing
assets' strategy generated more income than sitting on bullion. After 2003, the
story flips. Gold surged. On a simple thought experiment—keeping roughly the
1,023‑tonne peak from 2003 to today—the opportunity cost of selling looks on
the order of US$100–120 billion versus just holding the metal. Paper assets
grew modestly; bullion exploded.
G7 context
Every other G7 member still holds significant gold.
The U.S., Germany, Italy, France, Japan, and the U.K. treat bullion as a
strategic reserve asset. Canada stands out for having effectively none. You can
call that modern and nimble—or needlessly exposed to the fashions of finance.
Either way, it’s a choice, not an accident.
What should
citizens take from this?
·
Reserves are policy tools. Canada
optimised for liquidity, not long‑run price gains.
·
Gold has no yield—but it has
delivered massive price appreciation since 2003.
·
If the aim is crisis backstop,
liquid paper makes sense. If the aim is long‑horizon wealth insurance, some
bullion helps.
·
Being the only G7 with zero gold is
a strategic statement. Voters can decide if it’s the right one.
A spiritual
footnote
Scripture puts it plainly: 'The silver is mine, and
the gold is mine, saith the LORD' (Haggai 2:8, KJV). It also cautions against
trusting in 'uncertain riches' (1 Tim 6:17), while commending honest measures
(Prov 16:11) and diversified prudence (Eccl 11:2). Translation for public
policy: don’t idolise paper or metal. Steward resources with integrity, humility,
and a view to the long term.
Canada
chose paper over metal. That decision brought flexibility—and a hefty
opportunity cost once gold ran. If we’re serious about resilience, we should at
least be honest about the trade‑offs—and who ultimately owns the silver and the
gold.

Comments
Post a Comment
Pending moderation, your comment will be published. Thank You